log in |
1)
Message boards :
News :
Another experiment on E. coli
(Message 1257)
Posted 3 Feb 2018 by Krümel I undervolted a little bit. Offset is -0,05. 2,7 GHz @ 0,85 Volt |
2)
Message boards :
News :
Another experiment on E. coli
(Message 1255)
Posted 2 Feb 2018 by Krümel Why don't you try to overclock your Ryzen CPUs? With the stock cooler you can do it to 3.6-3.7 GHz without overheat it. I have a Ryzen 7 1700 at 3.9 GHz and it works perfectly. My R7 1700 is runnig @ 2,7 GHz to save Energie. Electricity is quiet expansive in Germany. At this speed the R7 uses less than 50 watts. @ 3.6 GHz it would be around 90 watts or more. :) |
3)
Message boards :
News :
Another experiment on E. coli
(Message 1245)
Posted 19 Jan 2018 by Krümel 5h 45min on my R7 1700 @ 2,7 GHz SMT on = 16 threads at a time. RAM @ 3.066 MHz |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimization
(Message 1224)
Posted 12 Dec 2017 by Krümel
OK, that´s just single channel and slows down the system as well. With two RAM-Sticks you would use dual channel with a much wider bandwith. |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimization
(Message 1221)
Posted 11 Dec 2017 by Krümel How is your RAM-Speed? On my R7 it makes a big differens between 2.133 MHz an 3.066 Mht (up to 30 minutes) |
6)
Message boards :
News :
Another experiment on E. coli
(Message 1189)
Posted 11 Nov 2017 by Krümel 2:15 h on my R7 1700. :) |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimization
(Message 1046)
Posted 10 Apr 2017 by Krümel Great job again Daniel. R7 1700 @ 3,2 GHz (SMT on) = 1.950 Sec. (down from 2.350 Sec.) with Win 10. Edit: AVX-App |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
FMA problems (Ryzen and others?)
(Message 1030)
Posted 7 Apr 2017 by Krümel I´m the risky kind of guy... ;) Well, but all about Ryzen-Mainboards is kind of "Beta". :D |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
FMA problems (Ryzen and others?)
(Message 1028)
Posted 6 Apr 2017 by Krümel OK something is still strange. Most FMA-WU worked propperly, but 4 errored with "Privileged Instruction". The new AGESA still seems "Beta". :) |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
FMA problems (Ryzen and others?)
(Message 1027)
Posted 5 Apr 2017 by Krümel Thanks to an AGESA-Update with the new Beta-Bios for my ASUS Prime B350-Plus the FMA-App is noe working fine with my R7 1700. It realy was the FMA-Bug of the new Ryzen Processor that caused the problem. |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
FMA problems (Ryzen and others?)
(Message 1008)
Posted 22 Mar 2017 by Krümel Same here with Ryzen 7 1700 and Win 10. FMA WUs won´t work. http://gene.disi.unitn.it/test/result.php?resultid=7952994 |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimization
(Message 830)
Posted 27 Jan 2017 by Krümel i7 6700T @ 3 GHz, HTT on (8 WU at a time) New AVX2-App: 34 Minutes FMA-App: 33 Minutes SSE2-App: 41 Minutes |
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimization
(Message 811)
Posted 25 Jan 2017 by Krümel The new FMA-App is great. Times dropt from 55 Minutes to 46 Minutes! |
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimization
(Message 809)
Posted 24 Jan 2017 by Krümel I have uploaded new version of FMA app for Windows and Linux 64bit. It uses shorter (SSE) vectors, so it should be faster than SSE version now. I´ll give it a try tomorrow. :) |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimization
(Message 801)
Posted 24 Jan 2017 by Krümel SSE2 = 52 Minutes |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimization
(Message 800)
Posted 24 Jan 2017 by Krümel Avg. runtime of the new FMA-App on a FX 8320 @ 3,5 GHz (RAM 1.333) = 55 Minutes. AVX-App = 58 Minutes. Now testing SSE2... |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimization
(Message 789)
Posted 23 Jan 2017 by Krümel OK, tried SSE2 once again and it is working. :) FMA seems to be running too. Thank You Daniel! |
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimization
(Message 784)
Posted 23 Jan 2017 by Krümel Hi, thank You. But I´m getting compute errors with the new SSE2 and FMA App. Only AVX ist working very well on my FX 8320 (Win 10 64 bit). Keep on Your great work! |