symbol lookup error

Author	Message
Mr. Hankey Send message Joined: 20 May 14 Posts: 2 Credit: 52,040 RAC: 0	Message 417 - Posted: 21 May 2014, 23:54:37 UTC
I am erroring out WUs with a symbol lookup error. See this WU: http://gene.disi.unitn.it/test/result.php?resultid=98594
ID: 417 · Reply Quote

FrancescoAsnicar [SSC11] Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Nov 13 Posts: 51 Credit: 7,316,309 RAC: 0	Message 419 - Posted: 23 May 2014, 9:37:42 UTC - in response to Message 417.
Thanks for reporting the issues. We are collecting all issues reports, and at the end of this second test phase we investigate each one in order to fix the application. Can I ask you: it was just that work-units that report the problem or you get other work-units with the same error? Thank you very much ____________
ID: 419 · Reply Quote

valterc Project administrator Project tester Send message Joined: 30 Oct 13 Posts: 624 Credit: 34,677,535 RAC: 0	Message 420 - Posted: 23 May 2014, 13:24:11 UTC - in response to Message 419. Last modified: 23 May 2014, 13:28:15 UTC
For what I can see: - All the workunits running on computer ID 324 gave the same error. - That Gentoo kernel is rather old, around end of 2009 - I guess that is something related with linking/libraries etc. The output of the following commands should be useful to us readelf -d tngrid_expansion_v9_linux64 ldd -d -r tngrid_expansion_v9_linux64 - Do we distribute a statically builded executable? (I don't remember...) In this case adding -static to -static-libstdc++ could fix this... Otherwise I guess the only solution would be to build a static exe.
ID: 420 · Reply Quote

Mr. Hankey Send message Joined: 20 May 14 Posts: 2 Credit: 52,040 RAC: 0	Message 424 - Posted: 31 May 2014, 1:50:07 UTC
the output ldd -d -r tngrid_expansion_v9_linux64: readelf -d tngrid_expansion_v9_linux64 Dynamic section at offset 0xb5508 contains 29 entries: Tag Type Name/Value 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libm.so.6] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libgcc_s.so.1] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libpthread.so.0] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libc.so.6] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [ld-linux-x86-64.so.2] 0x000000000000000c (INIT) 0x40b210 0x000000000000000d (FINI) 0x486cec 0x0000000000000019 (INIT_ARRAY) 0x6b0000 0x000000000000001b (INIT_ARRAYSZ) 80 (bytes) 0x000000000000001a (FINI_ARRAY) 0x6b0050 0x000000000000001c (FINI_ARRAYSZ) 8 (bytes) 0x0000000000000004 (HASH) 0x400298 0x000000006ffffef5 (GNU_HASH) 0x400ec0 0x0000000000000005 (STRTAB) 0x4048d0 0x0000000000000006 (SYMTAB) 0x4018b8 0x000000000000000a (STRSZ) 13430 (bytes) 0x000000000000000b (SYMENT) 24 (bytes) 0x0000000000000015 (DEBUG) 0x0 0x0000000000000003 (PLTGOT) 0x6b60d8 0x0000000000000002 (PLTRELSZ) 4800 (bytes) 0x0000000000000014 (PLTREL) RELA 0x0000000000000017 (JMPREL) 0x409f50 0x0000000000000007 (RELA) 0x408228 0x0000000000000008 (RELASZ) 7464 (bytes) 0x0000000000000009 (RELAENT) 24 (bytes) 0x000000006ffffffe (VERNEED) 0x408148 0x000000006fffffff (VERNEEDNUM) 5 0x000000006ffffff0 (VERSYM) 0x407d46 0x0000000000000000 (NULL) 0x0 and the ldd command states not a dynamic executable
ID: 424 · Reply Quote

Author

Message

Mr. Hankey
Send message
Joined: 20 May 14
Posts: 2
Credit: 52,040
RAC: 0

I am erroring out WUs with a symbol lookup error. See this WU:

http://gene.disi.unitn.it/test/result.php?resultid=98594

ID: 417 · Reply Quote

FrancescoAsnicar [SSC11]
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 13
Posts: 51
Credit: 7,316,309
RAC: 0

Thanks for reporting the issues. We are collecting all issues reports, and at the end of this second test phase we investigate each one in order to fix the application.
Can I ask you: it was just that work-units that report the problem or you get other work-units with the same error?

Thank you very much
____________

ID: 419 · Reply Quote

valterc
Project administrator
Project tester
Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 13
Posts: 624
Credit: 34,677,535
RAC: 0

For what I can see:
- All the workunits running on computer ID 324 gave the same error.
- That Gentoo kernel is rather old, around end of 2009
- I guess that is something related with linking/libraries etc. The output of the following commands should be useful to us

readelf -d tngrid_expansion_v9_linux64 ldd -d -r tngrid_expansion_v9_linux64

- Do we distribute a statically builded executable? (I don't remember...) In this case adding -static to -static-libstdc++ could fix this... Otherwise I guess the only solution would be to build a static exe.

ID: 420 · Reply Quote

Mr. Hankey
Send message
Joined: 20 May 14
Posts: 2
Credit: 52,040
RAC: 0

the output ldd -d -r tngrid_expansion_v9_linux64:

readelf -d tngrid_expansion_v9_linux64 Dynamic section at offset 0xb5508 contains 29 entries: Tag Type Name/Value 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libm.so.6] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libgcc_s.so.1] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libpthread.so.0] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libc.so.6] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [ld-linux-x86-64.so.2] 0x000000000000000c (INIT) 0x40b210 0x000000000000000d (FINI) 0x486cec 0x0000000000000019 (INIT_ARRAY) 0x6b0000 0x000000000000001b (INIT_ARRAYSZ) 80 (bytes) 0x000000000000001a (FINI_ARRAY) 0x6b0050 0x000000000000001c (FINI_ARRAYSZ) 8 (bytes) 0x0000000000000004 (HASH) 0x400298 0x000000006ffffef5 (GNU_HASH) 0x400ec0 0x0000000000000005 (STRTAB) 0x4048d0 0x0000000000000006 (SYMTAB) 0x4018b8 0x000000000000000a (STRSZ) 13430 (bytes) 0x000000000000000b (SYMENT) 24 (bytes) 0x0000000000000015 (DEBUG) 0x0 0x0000000000000003 (PLTGOT) 0x6b60d8 0x0000000000000002 (PLTRELSZ) 4800 (bytes) 0x0000000000000014 (PLTREL) RELA 0x0000000000000017 (JMPREL) 0x409f50 0x0000000000000007 (RELA) 0x408228 0x0000000000000008 (RELASZ) 7464 (bytes) 0x0000000000000009 (RELAENT) 24 (bytes) 0x000000006ffffffe (VERNEED) 0x408148 0x000000006fffffff (VERNEEDNUM) 5 0x000000006ffffff0 (VERSYM) 0x407d46 0x0000000000000000 (NULL) 0x0

and the ldd command states not a dynamic executable

ID: 424 · Reply Quote