valtercProject administrator
Project tester
Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 13
Posts: 623
Credit: 34,677,535
RAC: 1
There is another experiment on Ec floating around, this one uses *very* computing intensive search parameters. An average workunit should last 3-6 hours. As usual we started just with a few batches, the next Monday, if everything goes well, we will put them all into the system.
One side effect of this is that the work generator should be able, during this experiment, to keep the queue full.
Reply
Quote
2:15 h on my R7 1700. :)
Reply
Quote
valtercProject administrator
Project tester
Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 13
Posts: 623
Credit: 34,677,535
RAC: 1
2:15 h on my R7 1700. :)
better than average!
Reply
Quote
2:15 h on my R7 1700. :)
Over 6h on my FX6300. :-(
It's time to change my cpu....
Reply
Quote
valtercProject administrator
Project tester
Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 13
Posts: 623
Credit: 34,677,535
RAC: 1
I just started with a few batches of a new experiment (Ec-1000) which is the most computationally complex even ran here. A single workunit should run for ~3.4 hours on our reference computer (Intel 4770K running Linux, SSE2 version, hyper-threaded cpu with just one core thread used)
Reply
Quote
These are running about 5 hours on my Win 10 4770K @ 4GHz...
____________
Reply
Quote
These are running about 5 hours on my Win 10 4770K @ 4GHz...
as explained by Danien at the end of this thread
http://gene.disi.unitn.it/test/forum_thread.php?id=135#1229
with TN-Grid app, ram frequency is more important than cpu speed
Reply
Quote
Thanks for the link...maybe I'll try OC on my memory then.
____________
Reply
Quote
5h 45min on my R7 1700 @ 2,7 GHz SMT on = 16 threads at a time. RAM @ 3.066 MHz
Reply
Quote
A single workunit should run for ~3.4 hours on our reference computer
Too much long for my FX6300, over 8 hours.
Is it possible to postpone the deadline for these wus?
Reply
Quote
4h 45min on my ryzen 5 1600 stock, SMT on (12WU) ram at 2933mhz
Reply
Quote
valtercProject administrator
Project tester
Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 13
Posts: 623
Credit: 34,677,535
RAC: 1
A single workunit should run for ~3.4 hours on our reference computer
Too much long for my FX6300, over 8 hours.
Is it possible to postpone the deadline for these wus?
The new ones should have a deadline of five days. The previous one was four, if BOINC is working correctly this shouldn't be a problem, just a smaller cache.
Reply
Quote
Why don't you try to overclock your Ryzen CPUs? With the stock cooler you can do it to 3.6-3.7 GHz without overheat it. I have a Ryzen 7 1700 at 3.9 GHz and it works perfectly.
____________
ASUS X570 E-Gaming
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, 16 core / 32 thread 4.4 GHz
AMD Radeon Sapphire RX 480 4GB Nitro+
Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio
4x16 GB Corsair Vengeance RGB 3466 MHz
Reply
Quote
However, 0:40 ~ 4:00 hours for every WU.
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 at 3.9 GHz
RAM 2x8GB 3200 MHz CL16
Reply
Quote
However, 0:40 ~ 4:00 hours for every WU.
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 at 3.9 GHz
RAM 2x8GB 3200 MHz CL16
My bottleneck is ram bandwidth because i have only 1 stick
as explained by Daniel at the end of this thread
http://gene.disi.unitn.it/test/forum_thread.php?id=135#1229
in my case, overclock on CPU is not so good
Reply
Quote
The new ones should have a deadline of five days. The previous one was four, if BOINC is working correctly this shouldn't be a problem, just a smaller cache.
I still see deadlines of four days, not five, what am I missing?. My hosts only run a few hours per day and the slow ones really struggle to complete work on time.
Reply
Quote
valtercProject administrator
Project tester
Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 13
Posts: 623
Credit: 34,677,535
RAC: 1
The new ones should have a deadline of five days. The previous one was four, if BOINC is working correctly this shouldn't be a problem, just a smaller cache.
I still see deadlines of four days, not five, what am I missing?. My hosts only run a few hours per day and the slow ones really struggle to complete work on time.
My fault... I thought I did that but actually I didn't.... Anyway, the batch of slow ones is almost completed.
Reply
Quote
Why don't you try to overclock your Ryzen CPUs? With the stock cooler you can do it to 3.6-3.7 GHz without overheat it. I have a Ryzen 7 1700 at 3.9 GHz and it works perfectly.
My R7 1700 is runnig @ 2,7 GHz to save Energie.
Electricity is quiet expansive in Germany.
At this speed the R7 uses less than 50 watts.
@ 3.6 GHz it would be around 90 watts or more. :)
Reply
Quote
Why don't you try to overclock your Ryzen CPUs? With the stock cooler you can do it to 3.6-3.7 GHz without overheat it. I have a Ryzen 7 1700 at 3.9 GHz and it works perfectly.
My R7 1700 is runnig @ 2,7 GHz to save Energie.
Electricity is quiet expansive in Germany.
At this speed the R7 uses less than 50 watts.
@ 3.6 GHz it would be around 90 watts or more. :)
You just set cpu multiplier to x27? Or you have add an undervolt?
I will try to set my r5-1600 from 3.4ghz (1,07v vcore) to 3-3.1ghz
I also test if CPU stay less time waiting for memory
Reply
Quote
I undervolted a little bit. Offset is -0,05.
2,7 GHz @ 0,85 Volt
Reply
Quote